A stack of books by my bed.
- September 6th, 2010
- Posted in Life
- Write comment
The library is a poor bibliophile’s best friend. Ever since I went through Dave Ramsey’s Financial Peace University, I’ve come to appreciate the utter free-ness of my local library (and the utopian marvel of interlibrary loans). I’ve placed so many holds, in fact, that I’ve memorized my lengthy, cryptic library card number. At present there is a stack of four books by my bed that were checked out from that public haven of enlightenment—three of them being read simultaneously—simply because there can be.
I didn’t always enjoy reading. I read the odd book growing up, and remember Charles Dickens’ novels particularly affecting me. But for all my nerdy homeschooledness, I just wasn’t one of those kids always curled up in a chair with nose buried (my nerddom manifested itself in far more chilling ways). I read a few of the books assigned in high school—claiming Alan Paton’s Cry, the Beloved Country as my all-time favorite upon finishing it—but I resented the obligation to read for a teacher, and denied any temptation to read for my own pleasure.
My explanation for this teenage distaste for reading was that the activity sucked me into a time-altering vortex, and I loathed the feeling of losing two hours in another world only to be rewarded with the groggy stumble out of an escapist stupor back into reality. (It was and is the same reason I hate seeing films at the theater in the afternoon; entering the cinema during daylight and exiting under nightfall is uncomfortably disorienting for me.)
I realize millions of people read for just the reason I avoided it: to escape reality for a few adventure-filled hours, forgetting themselves in the process.
During my college years, taking Great Books classes with long syllabi of compulsory reading, I slowly and finally began to acquire a taste for reading. You could argue that the taste was already there (as my childhood enjoyment of David Copperfield and Cry, The Beloved Country attest), but I finally developed an appetite for the literary cuisine, and an insatiable one at that. Homer, Voltaire, Socrates, Augustine, Kierkegaard, Dante, Austen, Dostoevsky. In two years I took a whirlwind trip through literature history, and another hopeless bibliophile was born.
What’s interesting is, it wasn’t as though my early excuses for avoiding books were suddenly eclipsed in my newfound love of escapism. To this day I prefer non-fiction to anything like “escapist” literature, and I only enjoy the occasional fiction novel.
I recently self-analyzed, and came to the conclusion that I do not read in order to escape. It seems that I read to see myself and my life in perspective. My favorite kind of books, usually involving some kind of overriding spiritual idealism, don’t distract me from my troubles; they reveal my troubles as being universal and, often, trivial.
I enjoy reading because it is one of the best tools I know of to recalibrate my mind and heart, those two most valuable internal organs. When I read a good book (by my definition), it helps me to sort things out. It often lifts unnecessarily heavy burdens I’m carrying and puts a new spring in my step (proverbially, of course). The fiction I enjoy has something of the same effect; rather than temporarily distracting me from my life, it provides some helpful commentary on it.
I don’t claim any superiority in my particular love of reading (and perhaps it’s not all that unusual). It’s only my explanation for why I went from avoiding books to staying up too late every night reading stacks of them.

It’s kind of amazing just how powerful reading is. It’s the way God chose to make Himself known to most of his disciples. He could have waited until we had invented camcorders before He sent His Son, but He didn’t, and I think that’s significant.
There were a couple of years after I took Great Books that I actually didn’t read anything. All that required reading made the thought of reading magazines, newspapers, books, or anything seem like a chore. But thankfully I’m past that now.
Right now I try to keep one non-fiction and one fiction book on my nightstand at all times. Too much of either one isn’t good for you, I’ve decided.
@Nick Smith
It is powerful. And you’re probably wise to balance your fiction and non reading. I know I would enjoy reading more fiction, but it’s difficult to pry myself away from the other stuff.
The public library is a sorely underutilized resource — one reason (among others) I haven’t jumped on the e-book reader bandwagon is that I try to borrow rather than buy if possible, and most libraries’ digital collections are still in their formative stages.
I’ve been on a non-fiction book kick as well the last several years — specifically spirituality/theology/”Christian Living” books. Overstreet provides a nice respite when installments in his delightful Auralia fantasy series appear, but in general I don’t have the same passion for fiction reading I did as a child (when I clamored for every book ever written by Orson Scott Card or Chaim Potok).
You discuss motives for reading — I think I fall more in the escapist camp. Nonetheless, it’s hard not to come away with some sense of greater perspective after having read a book. The real question is: does that added dimension to my perceptual prism have any real transformative effect on how I live?
Interestingly, your blog entry dovetails nicely with a segment on today’s Talk of the Nation.
@Alan
Wow, perhaps there is a collective consciousness after all. Thanks for pointing my attention to that piece.
I, too, question the actual transformative power of reading. When I read a good “spiritual” book, for the moment my perspective is realigned and cleared of mental debris. But am I only engaging in what Shane Claiborne refers to as “spiritual bulimia,” where I gorge on Christian/spiritual books only to vomit the information back up without actually digesting it and putting thought into practice? I fear there is all too much truth in this.
I’m trying to find the gumption to cross the threshold between theory and practice, reading and living. It’s far too easy to hold the act of bearing better fruit at arms length in favor of dissecting and reading analyses of that fruit. Easy…and deadly.